Paddle Planner
PP
Login
Menu
General
Home
About Us
Membership
Advertising & Affiliates
Legal Notices
Resources
Maps
Permits
Outfitters
Locations
Printed Maps
Downloads
Books & Gear
Community
Forum
Photos
Trip Reports
Recent Activity
Javascript is not enabled on your browser. Many parts of this site will not work correctly without javascript. Please enable javascript or use a javascript-enabled browser.
Quetico Portage 5316 (Tanner)
You must
login
to upload photos
Portage Information
Elevation Chart
Comments
My Comments
Photos
You can click on the campsites, portages, and lakes on the map to go to their respective pages. To see the portage on a fully interactive map, click on the "View on Interactive Map" link found below.
View on Interactive Map
Approximate Length:
1002m (199 rods)
Lakes:
Tanner
Climb/Descent Meters:
16.2
"Hilliness" Index
16
# of Comments:
4
On 11/2/2024 1:32:39 PM,
rationmaster
said:
Visit Date:
9/29/2024
Past comments describe this portage accurately in my opinion. Since the fire in 2021, this portage was seldomly used and overgrown. Just commenting to say this portage was cleared by Quetico Portage crews in September of 2024. Due to a dry fall and a scorched, exposed landscape, the portage was much drier than I was expecting. I would still expect it to be very wet in June.
On 8/4/2019 9:42:58 PM,
mcg
said:
Visit Date:
I've complete this portage (Eat em Up) 3 times. Each time North to South (1995, 2015, 2019) and it has basically been the same each time. Lots of moose muck, pretty buggy, and the swamp area about 3/4 through the portage is especially moose mucky (crotch deep in parts). Most importantly, however, is that the north egress onto the portage is incorrectly located on PaddlePlanner, McKenzie, and Fisher maps. The north egress is actually located directly south of the tip of the large, southmost island in Tanner lake (as opposed to at the south creek). Of course, the official Quetico Park map accurately marks the portage.
On 6/2/2018 12:23:33 PM,
elpirkl
said:
Visit Date:
6/1/2018
This portage sucked. Top 2 worst portages I have done. There is a bog right in the middle that the trail runs straight through. One step and you go hip deep (no exaggeration). Hopefully you don't lose a shoe or boot. Heck of a lot longer than 199 rods too. Will avoid doing this one again. Also, Andrews Creek now has three beaver dams you have to lift your canoe over.
On 8/30/2014 4:39:02 PM,
Chris Hoepker
said:
Visit Date:
8/18/2014
Not as bad as the name (Eat 'em up) implies. We got very wet from the heavy growth of brush. Some nasty mud in the middle.
You must be
logged in
to comment on portages.
Visit Date:
The approximate date that you visited the portage
Description:
Public/Private:
Public
Private
You must be
logged in
to upload photos
Your browser does not support iframes.
Above is a link to this page that includes your affiliate ID. If someone clicks on the link and, within 30 days, becomes a paying member, you will receive a commission of
0%
.
Use the link on Facebook, Twitter, other social media, emails, your blog, website, or any other place you can post a link
DO NOT use any links with your affiliate ID in places that commercial posting is not allowed, such as certain forums and messageboards
Remember to disclose that you are an affiliate of the company
Be aware of the commercial posting policies of the places you are putting the link
If you are looking for banner ads or other visual materials, check out the
affiliate materials page
Above is a link to this page that includes your outfitter ID. If someone clicks on the link, they will see only your outfitter advertisements for the duration of their visit to the website or 20 minutes, whichever is longer.
New Messages
Log In
Username or Email:
*
Password:
*
Remember me next time.
Register
|
Forgot Password?
My Profile
My Saved Routes
My Photos
My Trip Reports
My Ratings & Comments
My Points of Interest
My Permit Alerts
My Messages
My Free McKenzie Maps
My Affiliate Program
Login